Blog

For both current and prospective asylum seekers and refugees, potential changes to asylum laws are creating rippling impacts across multiple dimensions of their lives. For current applicants, stricter laws are likely to mean longer processing times and increased uncertainty. These individuals, who have already invested significant time navigating the complicated immigration system may face new bureaucratic hurdles or changed criteria that affect their pending cases. This can leave them in legal limbo, impacting their ability to work, access services, or plan for their futures. The psychological toll can be severe and is likely to exacerbate the trauma that many asylum seekers already endure based on experiences in their home countries. Though new asylum policies are still being rolled out, they’ll likely include heightened evidentiary requirements of their persecution claims. This will add to the challenges of those who fled their homes quickly or whose evidence remains in their country of origin. Some may need to gather new forms of documentation or testimony to meet stricter standards, which will be difficult or impossible. For prospective asylum seekers, new laws may create barriers to accessing the asylum system at all. New policies may limit where and when people can apply, establish additional pre-screening requirements, or implement "safe third country" agreements requiring asylum seekers to request protection in the countries they passed through. These changes can effectively prevent many from ever having their claims heard, regardless of their merit. The human cost of these changes will be evident in various ways. Some asylum seekers may be forced to remain in dangerous situations longer, increasing their exposure to persecution. Others may attempt riskier routes to safety, potentially falling victim to human trafficking or dangerous border crossings. Families may face prolonged separation if some members have already reached safety while others are blocked by new restrictions. Restrictive laws also tend to have broader societal implications. They can push asylum seekers into informal or underground situations, making them more vulnerable to exploitation. Communities that traditionally supported asylum seekers may find their resources stretched as people spend longer periods in temporary arrangements. The country’s approach to refugees and asylum was a driving topic in the 2024 presidential election and continues to be controversial, with emotions running high on all sides, for different reasons. If you or someone you love has been caught in the middle, you need help from legal professionals who are on the cutting edge of the law. Contact us today to set up a time for us to talk about your situation.

There are plenty of reasons why an individual would want to move from the area where they lived when they were first divorced. But in Pennsylvania, if your marriage included children and a custody agreement is in place, then relocating with your children will involve navigating specific legal requirements. Pennsylvania’s Child Custody Act governs these cases and defines relocation as a move that significantly impacts the non-relocating parent’s ability to exercise custodial rights. As in all things, the law emphasizes protecting the child’s best interests. If you are considering a move, the first thing you will need to do is provide formal written notice of your intent to relocate to your ex or anyone else who has custodial rights. This notice needs to be sent via certified mail and has to be provided at least 60 days before your proposed move (or within 10 days of learning about the need to relocate). All essential information needs to be provided, including the proposed new address, the reasons for your relocation, and a proposal for revised custody arrangements. Upon receipt, the non-relocating parent or person with custody has 30 days to file an objection with the court. If no such objection is filed within this time frame, the court may grant permission for the relocation without a hearing. If, however, the other party files an objection, a court hearing will be scheduled to evaluate the request. You cannot relocate without court approval unless the non-relocating parent consents to the move in writing. When presented with both the request and the non-relocating parent’s objection, the court will assess several factors to determine whether the relocation is in the child’s best interests. These factors include: The quality of relationships between the child and both parents. The age, needs, and developmental stage of the child. The feasibility of maintaining meaningful contact with the non-relocating parent. The child’s preference, considering their age and maturity. The reason for the relocation and any potential benefits for the child. The impact of the move on the child’s education, social life, and stability. Any history of abuse by either parent. If, upon reviewing each of these elements, the court approves your relocation, your custody order will be modified to reflect the new arrangements. The court will work to balance both your interests and the legitimate interests and rights of your ex-spouse, as well as what is in the child’s best interest. You must follow the letter of the law when it comes to relocating your children following a divorce. Failing to do so can result in penalties ranging from denial of the request to loss of your custody rights. For assistance in pursuing this course of action, contact our experienced attorneys today.

Falls are a leading cause of injury among nursing home residents, often resulting in broken bones, head trauma, or worse. In many cases, these falls are preventable and occur due to neglect. Common Causes of Falls in Nursing Homes Falls may result from: Understaffing : Insufficient supervision leaves residents at greater risk. Hazardous Conditions : Wet floors, poor lighting, or unsteady furniture create dangers. Inadequate Mobility Assistance : Residents who rely on staff for movement can fall if assistance is improperly provided. Recognizing Neglect Signs of neglect include frequent falls, unexplained injuries, or staff reluctance to discuss incidents. If your loved one is injured, act quickly to protect their rights. Taking Legal Action You may be able to file a claim against the nursing home for failing to provide adequate care. Compensation can help cover medical bills, rehabilitation, and pain and suffering. Jensen Bagnato Law is committed to protecting the rights of nursing home residents and holding negligent facilities accountable. Contact us today for compassionate legal support .

Ride-sharing services like Uber and Lyft have revolutionized transportation, but accidents involving these vehicles can leave passengers, pedestrians, or other drivers with serious injuries. Understanding your rights and the insurance coverage at play is critical. Who is Liable in a Ride-Share Accident? Liability depends on several factors, including the ride-share driver’s status at the time of the accident: Not Logged Into the App : The driver’s personal insurance applies. Logged Into the App but No Passenger : Uber and Lyft provide limited liability coverage. Transporting a Passenger : Uber and Lyft carry up to $1 million in liability insurance for active rides. Steps to Take After a Ride-Share Accident Seek medical attention for any injuries, no matter how minor they may seem. Document the scene, including the vehicle’s license plate, driver’s information, and details from the ride-share app. Report the accident to the ride-share company through its app. Consult a lawyer to determine the best course of action. Jensen Bagnato Law specializes in personal injury cases and can help you navigate the complexities of dealing with Uber, Lyft, and insurance companies. Contact us for a free consultation .

If you are an immigrant to the United States who is in the United States on an H-1B visa, recent developments surrounding skilled worker visas in the United States are of particular interest to you. With a new administration coming into power, there are significant questions about what will happen, and whether policy changes and shifting perspectives across political and economic sectors will impact your future. The H-1B visa program was designed to allow U.S. companies to employ foreign workers with specialized, high-level knowledge in fields including technology, engineering, and finance. Despite the resounding success of this program and the innovations it has facilitated, the H1B program has also faced increasing scrutiny from both sides of the political aisle. Recent debates have underscored concerns about how the program may have led to wage suppression and potential exploitation of foreign workers, while others express a belief that it has led to the displacement of U.S. workers. Meanwhile, proponents argue that skilled immigration is essential for maintaining American innovation and competitiveness on a global scale. Figures trusted by incoming president Donald Trump, including Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, have made headlines in recent days as they defended the H-1B program. Musk emphasized the necessity of skilled immigrants for innovation. Proposed reforms include increasing salary thresholds for H-1B positions as a measure to ensure fair compensation and reduce worker exploitation. Despite this notable support, there is also substantial and vocal political resistance to continuing the H1-B program. Another faction within the Republican Party is insisting on tighter immigration controls. They’ve framed skilled immigration as a threat to American workers amid broader anti-immigration sentiments and discussions about national security concerns linked to foreign workforce dependency. There are many sectors of American industry that are reliant on skilled workers from foreign nations. They’ve reported significant labor shortages and are urging the government to adopt more flexible visa policies including faster processing times and increasing H-1B visa allocations. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has implemented changes aimed at streamlining the application process, including increased digitalization and expedited pathways for applicants in specific high-demand industries. These changes offer some relief to employers. Pressure from political factions, industry leaders, and worker advocacy groups has left the future of skilled worker visa policies uncertain. While these debates will have a lasting impact on the country’s technological leadership and workforce diversity, they also have a personal impact on any individuals seeking to remain or enter the United States to contribute to its innovative strength. If you are struggling to obtain a visa or need guidance on whether you will be able to remain in the United States, contact our experienced immigration attorneys today.

Gyms are supposed to be spaces where you can prioritize health and wellness. Unfortunately, injuries caused by faulty equipment, hazardous conditions, or negligent trainers can derail those goals and leave you with lasting physical and financial burdens. Common Causes of Gym Injuries Defective Equipment : Machines that malfunction or lack proper maintenance can result in severe injuries, from muscle strains to broken bones. Hazardous Conditions : Spilled water, loose weights, or poorly lit areas can lead to slip-and-fall accidents. Trainer Negligence : Trainers who lack qualifications or push clients beyond safe limits may cause preventable injuries. Determining Liability Liability in gym injuries can vary depending on the circumstances: Gym Owners : Responsible for maintaining safe conditions and equipment. Equipment Manufacturers : If a machine fails due to a design or manufacturing defect, the manufacturer may be liable. Trainers or Staff : Negligent training practices or failure to address hazards can result in staff liability. Protecting Your Rights After an Injury If you’re injured, report the incident to gym management immediately. Take photographs of the hazard, collect contact information for witnesses, and seek medical attention. Then, reach out to an experienced personal injury attorney to explore your legal options. Jensen Bagnato Law has extensive experience handling personal injury claims including gym-related injury cases. Let us help you recover the compensation you deserve so you can focus on your recovery .

Skiing and snowboarding are thrilling winter activities, but accidents on the slopes can lead to life-changing injuries. Whether it’s a collision with another skier, a malfunctioning ski lift, or an improperly marked trail, determining liability at a ski resort can be complex. Common Causes of Ski Resort Accidents Accidents can occur due to a variety of reasons, including: Collisions with Other Skiers : Reckless behavior, such as skiing at high speeds or ignoring trail etiquette, can lead to accidents. In these cases, the responsible skier may be held liable. Lift Malfunctions : Resorts are responsible for maintaining ski lifts. If a lift failure occurs due to improper maintenance, the resort could be at fault. Hazardous Terrain : Ski resorts are required to warn visitors of dangerous conditions, such as hidden rocks or icy patches. Failure to do so may constitute negligence. Can You Sue a Ski Resort? While many ski resorts require participants to sign liability waivers, these do not protect the resort from claims of gross negligence or unsafe conditions. If your injury was caused by the resort’s failure to provide a safe environment, you may have grounds for legal action. Steps to Take After a Ski Accident After an accident, notify ski patrol and document the scene thoroughly. Take photographs of the hazard and any injuries, and gather witness statements if possible. Then, consult with an attorney to evaluate your claim. At Jensen Bagnato Law , we understand the nuances of ski resort accident claims and are committed to helping injured individuals seek justice. Contact us to discuss your case .

Divorce almost always presents emotional and financial challenges, but the issues that arise when some (or all) of the assets that need to be equitably distributed include cryptocurrency are unique. Though Bitcoin, Ethereum, and others have become increasingly popular, their decentralized and often untraceable nature have made their identification, valuation, and division particularly complex. Unlike traditional financial assets, cryptocurrencies are not held in a conventional bank account, and their prices are highly volatile. Their values can fluctuate dramatically within hours, which means that the value assigned to them during the divorce proceedings may no longer be accurate by the time of settlement. Additionally, the method by which cryptocurrency is valued can vary depending on whether the accountant chooses to use its spot price, an average over time, or some other metric. Reaching an agreement on fair valuation can be complicated, especially in situations that are already adversarial. Making things even more difficult, cryptocurrencies are often spread across multiple wallets or exchanges. Some may be stored offline, in what are termed “cold wallets,” making finding and evaluating them or determining the historical acquisition cost, potential gains, and associated tax implications incredibly complex. Cryptocurrencies operate on what is known as blockchain technology. While the advantage of this is that it ensures transparency, it also enables anonymity, making it difficult to determine whether hidden crypto holdings exist. Unlike traditional assets, cryptocurrencies aren’t physical and don’t have centralized records. If you or your spouse have cryptocurrency holdings, it is likely that you will need to enlist the help of a forensic accountant to uncover potentially undisclosed assets. The equitable distribution of cryptocurrency is further complicated by the lack of regulatory framework surrounding it. Most courts do not fully understand the assets, and this unfamiliarity, the lack of precedent, and the asset’s volatility combine to make the outcomes very unpredictable. There are also complexities surrounding transaction fees, private keys, and wallet addresses – all of these are terms and technicalities that may be unfamiliar or unknown to the other spouse. The risk of misrepresentation, as well as incorrect transfers, is high. If you are facing divorce and either know or suspect that your distribution of assets will require addressing issues surrounding cryptocurrency, you must work with attorneys who have deep knowledge and experience in dealing with them. For information and assistance, contact us today .